html
Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS)
The system includes tasks or problems that teachers can implement with their students, and rubrics that help the teacher interpret students' responses. Teachers using MFAS ask students to perform mathematical tasks, explain their reasoning, and justify their solutions. Rubrics for interpreting and evaluating student responses are included so that teachers can differentiate instruction based on students' strategies instead of relying solely on correct or incorrect answers. The objective is to understand student thinking so that teaching can be adapted to improve student achievement of mathematical goals related to the standards. Like all formative assessment, MFAS is a process rather than a test. Research suggests that well-designed and implemented formative assessment is an effective strategy for enhancing student learning. Please see below a list of available and under development components:
Available MFAS Components
The following are the available Resource from the Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS):-
Tasks and Rubrics for
Grades K-Geometry
Access 1,300+ tasks and rubrics that cover each of the mathematics standards for grades K through Algebra and Geometry.
Click here to access these resources » -
Lesson Study Resource Kits for Grades K-3, Algebra, and Geometry
Access 20 lesson study resource kits for grades K – 3, Algebra, and Geometry. These resource kits support teams of teachers engaging in the process of lesson study. Each resource kit is integrated into the iCPALMS Lesson Study Support System and interactively guide teachers through the stages of lesson study.
Click here to access these resources » -
Randomized Field Trials
Study Report
As part of the MFAS project, two randomized field trials of the effect of the use of MFAS on student achievement and teacher knowledge of content and pedagogy are being conducted. The results of these studies are very promising. Students of teachers who implemented MFAS over the course of the study performed significantly better on a mathematics achievement test than students of control teachers.
Click here to open the report »